Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Complement Integr Med ; 19(2): 383-388, 2022 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2249240

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the development and implementation of a separated pathway to check and treat patients with a suspected/confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the emergency department (ED) at King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital in Riyadh. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive longitudinal study from March to July 2020 by analyzing data of all confirmed cases of COVID-19 among ED visitors and healthcare workers in King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 1,182 swab samples were collected for testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), of which 285 (24.1%) tested positive. Of the 285 cases of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 18 were healthcare workers and 267 were patients. As a result of using the respiratory pathway for COVID-19 patients, the hospital managed to limit transmission of SARS-CoV-2 not only between patients but also between patients and healthcare workers, while also containing the pandemic. There were no cases of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection recorded among the patients who visited the ED or the flu clinic. All confirmed cases were community acquired and patients were cared for under constrained measures. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing infection control measures and restricting those with respiratory symptoms to the ED pathway prevented nosocomial spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the ED.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(21): e26102, 2021 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2191016

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Healthcare workers (HWs) perform a critical role not only in the clinical management of patients but also in providing adequate infection control and prevention measures and waste management procedures to be implemented in healthcare facilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness and knowledge of COVID-19 infection control precautions and waste management procedures among HWs in Saudi Arabian hospitals.This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Information on knowledge, awareness, and practice of infection control and waste management procedures were obtained from the HWs using a structured questionnaire. A thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.Our findings indicated that most of the study participants were knowledgeable, with a mean score of 78.3%. In total, 92.5%, 90.3%, and 91.7% of the participants were aware of the infection control precautions, COVID-19 waste management procedures, the availability of infection control supplies, respectively. HWs' Knowledge regarding waste management and infection control procedures correlated significantly with sex (P ≤ .001 and <.001), education (P = .024 and .043), and working experience (P = .029 and .009), respectively.Most participants appreciated the importance of their role in infection control, surveillance, and monitoring of the ongoing safety practices in their patients as well as their facilities and communities.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Infection Control/standards , Medical Waste Disposal/standards , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Facilities/standards , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(48): e31949, 2022 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2161254

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has globally impacted all aspects of life since its emergence and spread. There is a strong biological assumption and progressing epidemiological data supporting the role of vitamin D (VD) in COVID-19 infection. This study aims to determine the knowledge about VD supplements to boost immunity against COVID-19 and if participation in specific behaviors has increased the consumption of VD supplements during social distance restriction in Saudi Arabia (SA) in May 2021. This cross-sectional study used a structured online questionnaire for 2369 SA people, including demographic characteristics and knowledge about VD supplements to boost immunity against COVID-19 showed that there was a significant association between sex and vitamin D deficiency (VDD) (P = .000), and having VDD was strongly associated with having another vitamin deficiency (P = .008). Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference between VDD and cardiovascular (P = .027) and respiratory diseases (P = .019). Almost half of the participants used VD supplements to reduce or heal their COVID-19 symptoms. The adverse association between having VDD and understanding of COVID-19 symptoms was statistically significant (P = .01). Ginger is commonly used as an alternative medicine for the treatment of VD. The administration of VD is now known to be of physiological significance for general health, and evidence suggesting the beneficial role of VD in the prevention and/or treatment of diseases, particularly infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, is increasing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Vitamin D , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology
4.
IJID Reg ; 3: 268-274, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1899837

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the preparedness of Saudi healthcare facilities to handle the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Between April and June 2020, a cross-sectional study was conducted among Saudi hospitals using an online-administered English-language questionnaire by the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties. The questionnaire evaluates all aspects of risk management, infection control and preventative programmes that should be known and practised by all healthcare workers (HCWs). All HCWs in Saudi hospitals designated to accept patients with COVID-19 were involved in the study. Results: In total, 161 HCWs responded to the survey. General understanding of hospital risk management plans and infection prevention measures was found to be outstanding (80.4%), with no differences in responses by gender, education or occupation. Some differences in responses were found by age group and years of working experience. Most responses were from hospitals located in the Central Province (72.7%) and governmental hospitals (88%), and most provided family services (68%). Furthermore, the results showed that medical professionals received adequate training, which is recognized as the baseline for effective risk management and infection control and prevention procedures, policies and recommendations. Conclusions: Notwithstanding small differences between HCWs, this study found that all HCWs in Saudi hospitals had excellent knowledge of risk management plans and pandemic sub-plans of infection control and prevention policies, procedures and principles, which has aided the health authorities in Saudi Arabia in mitigating COVID-19 effectively.

5.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ; 15: 1527-1535, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1855192

ABSTRACT

Background: The persistent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has placed a significant burden on the scientific and medical professions. The study examined the association between body mass index (BMI), stratified by category, and severe form of COVID-19, and to explore the influence of demographic characteristics and other known risk factors. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis based on COVID-19 data from the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Health. Data were collected for all patients admitted to three main hospitals in Riyadh region between March 1st and July 30, 2020. The effects of BMI, demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and comorbidities on infection severity were investigated. Results: A total of 950 patients were included in the study (70% male, 85% aged younger than 60 years old). A total of 55 (5.8%) patients were underweight, 263 (27.7%) were normal weight, 351 (37%) were overweight, 161 (17%) were obese class I, 76 (8%) were obese class II, and 44 (4.6%) were obese class III. Cough, fever, and shortness of breath were the most common symptoms among overweight patients. According to the findings of a bivariate logistic regression study, class III obesity was significantly associated with a more severe form of COVID-19 (odds ratio, 2.874; 95% confidence interval, 1.344-6.149). Conclusion: This study revealed that patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 had a higher risk of severe COVID-19 than those with normal weight. This suggests that obesity is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 and influences disease presentation.

6.
J Infect Public Health ; 15(1): 36-41, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1603449

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Immunomodulators, including dexamethasone (DEX), have been recommended by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) to treat moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19. Tocilizumab (TCZ) was added to the treatment recommendations based on recent data from two large randomized controlled trials and its potential synergistic effect with DEX. METHOD: We included adult patients admitted from June until October 2020 with a PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. 135 patients with severe to critical COVID-19 and received TCZ and/or corticosteroid or DEX were retrospectively evaluated and followed until hospital discharge or death. RESULTS: The cohort was divided into two different groups of patients; TCZ group received TCZ ± corticosteroid, N = 100 and DEX group received DEX, N = 35. Groups were analyzed for hospital mortality. The rate of hospital mortality was 36% in TCZ and 37% in the DEX group, p = 0.91. Age of 60 years and above was associated with higher mortality rate with OR = 1.030 and 95% CI = (1.004, 1.057). More than 50% of patients required MV in both groups. Development of bacterial or fungal infection post immunomodulator were similar in TCZ and DEX groups, 29% vs. 31.4%. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that age of 60 years and above is the only factor associated with higher mortality rate regardless of the type of immunomodulator therapy. Findings of this study also revealed the lack of synergistic effect between TCZ and DEX on the hospital mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL